The Unyielding Grip: China’s Rare Earth Dominance

Jul 5, 2025

The Geopolitical Weaponization of Critical Minerals

China’s April 2025 export controls on seven rare earth elements samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium paralyzed global supply chains within weeks. Auto manufacturers in Europe and the U.S. faced production halts, while defense contractors scrambled for magnets essential to F-35 fighter jets and missile systems. Despite a 90-day U.S.China trade truce in May 2025, Beijing’s export licensing regime remains firmly in place, requiring end-user disclosures and 45-day approval windows. This system grants China unprecedented visibility into Western supply chains while preserving its leverage.

By the Numbers:

  • 70%: China’s share of global rare earth mining.

  • 90%: China’s control over global processing and refining capacity.

  • 100%: China’s monopoly on heavy rare earths (dysprosium, terbium) vital for high-performance magnets.

  • 37%: Drop in U.S. rare earth imports from China in April 2025 after restrictions.

  • 58%: Decline in U.S. rare earth magnet imports post-April controls.

Trade War Tactics: Tariffs vs. Export Controls

The U.S.-China tariff war reached a fever pitch in early 2025 when President Trump imposed 145% tariffs on Chinese goods, prompting Beijing to retaliate with rare earth export controls. The June 2025 "framework" deal reduced U.S. tariffs to 55% (comprising a 10% baseline reciprocal tariff, 20% fentanyl-related duty, and 25% Section 301 tariffs) while China’s tariffs remained at 10%. Crucially, the agreement failed to dismantle China’s licensing system. Instead, Beijing offered tactical concessions: limited export permits for select companies like Volkswagen’s magnet suppliers, while withholding approvals for U.S. defense firms.

Table: U.S. - China Trade War Timeline (2025)


Date

Event

Impact

April 4

China imposes export controls on 7 rare earths.

U.S. rare earth magnet imports drop 58% auto production lines stall globally

May 14

90-day tariff truce begins.

U.S. tariffs fall to 30%; China to 10%

June 12

"Framework" deal announced

U.S. tariffs set at 55%; China pledges "upfront" rare earth supplies.

China’s Commerce Ministry now demands "sensitive business information" including customer lists and production details from Western companies seeking licenses.

As James Kennedy of Three Consulting notes, "China gets a looking glass into what you’re doing". This bureaucratic mechanism enables Beijing to selectively reward allies (e.g., Germany’s Volkswagen) while punishing adversaries (e.g., U.S. defense contractors).

Industry Under Siege: Auto and Defense Sectors Reel

Automakers: By May 2025, inventories of neodymium-iron-boron magnets (critical for EV motors) neared depletion. Ford halted Explorer production in Chicago, while Suzuki suspended Swift manufacturing 14. European automakers faced "panic," with Wolfgang Niedermark of Germany’s Industry Federation warning of "major damage to production". Volkswagen secured limited licenses through Chinese suppliers, but shipments to Germany still fell 50% month-over-month in April. Some Indian manufacturers considered redesigning vehicles to fit Chinese sourced motor assemblies a costly stopgap.

Defense Contractors: U.S. firms like Lockheed Martin remain in limbo. China’s export rules require Pentagon-approved disclosures about military end-uses, enabling Beijing to delay or reject licenses strategically. "China specifically designed controls to hit the U.S. defense industry," says Thomas Kruemmer of Ginger International. The F-35 program requiring dysprosium for heat-resistant guidance systems faces acute vulnerability due to China’s heavy rare earth monopoly.

Diversification Dreams vs. Reality

Western efforts to break China’s stranglehold face steep hurdles:

  1. Scaling Challenges: The U.S. mines just 15% of its rare earth needs; Europe produces none. Solvay’s French plant the largest non-Chinese processor aims to supply 30% of Europe’s magnet demand by 2030, but admits using recycled materials as a temporary fix.

  2. Cost Barriers: China’s decades of price suppression bankrupted competitors. "Investors weren’t incentivized to pour in capital," notes Almonty Industries CEO Lewis Black.

  3. Timeline Gaps: Projects like Australia’s Iluka refinery (2026) and Arafura’s Nolans mine (2032) won’t yield significant output before 2030.

Table: Global Rare Earth Diversification Initiatives

Project

Region

Target Output

Timeline

Solvay processing plant

France

30% of EU magnet demand

2030

Iluka Eneabba Refinery

Australia

25,000 tons rare earth oxides/year

2026

MP Materials mine to magnet

USA/Saudi Arabia

1,000 tons magnets/year (1% of China’s output)

2025

The Permanent Leverage Strategy

China’s policies reveal a long-term vision:

  • Crackdowns on Smuggling: Concurrent with the trade truce, Beijing launched operations to "prevent illegal outflow of strategic minerals" from resource-rich provinces.

  • Tech Lockdown: A 2023 ban on rare earth extraction technology exports prevents rivals from replicating Chinese refining advances.

  • Tungsten Parallels: Controls on tungsten (80% market share) forced a European plant shutdown in June 2025, signaling China’s willingness to weaponize other minerals.

Geological advantages underpin this dominance: China’s ion-adsorption clay deposits allow 30% lower extraction costs than hard-rock mining elsewhere. As Rick Squire of Acorn Capital notes, "China’s clay deposits were game changers easy to define, mine, and process".

Robotics Revolution: The Irreplaceable Elements

Heavy rare earths (dysprosium, terbium) face irreversible demand growth due to robotics:

  • Dysprosium increases magnet coercivity by 50% at 150°C, enabling precision robotics.

  • Global dysprosium demand (12,000 tons) will outstrip supply (8,000 tons) by 2025.

  • Unlike wind turbines, robotics lack substitution options, creating permanent dependency.

Conclusion: The Illusion of Truce

The June 2025 "deal" masks a hard truth: China’s rare earth dominance is structural, not situational. By granting licenses sparingly prioritizing commercial partners like Europe over U.S. defense firms Beijing demonstrates how export controls outlast tariff skirmishes 814. For Western industries, survival hinges on costly, long-term supply chain rewiring. As automakers split ecosystems into "one for China, and one outside", the world confronts a bifurcated future where rare earth's are not just commodities, but the currency of geopolitical power.